3
The
Word
of God
St. Benedict
knew the Scriptures thoroughly. Copious references with
implicit and explicit citations demonstrate his familiarity
with God’s word. There is no doubt that he himself lent
it the attentive hearing that he wants in his disciples: “Listen,
my son” (R Prol), or that he “inclined
the ear of his heart” to it. He tried to make this hearing
easier for his followers; there are several indications to
this effect. During the readings in the Office, which were
mostly from the inspired books recognized as such by the Church
(books of divine authority), the community assumed a more comfortable
position: they sat, whereas for the psalms they stood. In the
refectory, where readings left unfinished in Choir were continued, “let
absolute silence be kept, so that no whispering may be heard
nor any voice except the reader’s” (R 38). Not everyone
was reader. Chosen were those with the ability to be heard
and to profit the listeners: “The brethren are not to
read in order, but only those who edify their hearers” (R
38). The brethren
had many occasions to read or hear the Scriptures. The
night Office included long readings, from three to twelve,
depending on the day or season. At table they again heard it,
and for Compline they came together
to listen to some four or five manuscript pages. Frequently
between the night and morning Office time was spent on the
Scriptures, with memorization of long passages that would be
recalled and dwelled upon during work. In addition, there were
the hours devoted to lectio divina, that
meditative reading of which Scripture was the major part,
together with commentaries by the holy Fathers. Thus, by will
of the lawgiver and abbot Benedict, who was only following
a long monastic tradition, the Bible is the pre-eminent book
of the Benedictine, the only one that is truly studied for
its own sake. The Bible in the Rule St. Benedict does not
quote every book of the Bible. Special recognition is given
to the psalms, which he knew by heart and so apportioned to
the Office that all of them would be said in the course of
every week. Certain ones, moreover, were to recur daily. The sapiential books afforded him a wealth of short didactic
sentences, easily remembered, that found a natural place in
a Rule whose tone is reminiscent of biblical wisdom literature: “Receive
willingly and carry out effectively your loving father’s
advice” (R Prol). Sirach and Proverbs are also often cited. Since Benedict’s
purpose was to outline a way to contemplative prayer through
practices of the spiritual combat that are presupposed
(the ascesis), he looks principally to the Gospel
of St. Matthew for his moral teaching. He also draws upon the
moral portions of St. Paul’s epistles, rather than the
strictly doctrinal content. In an effort
to lead his disciples to conversion and to encourage them and
support their pursuit of the virtuous life, Benedict gives
the example of a variety of biblical figures: Jacob, Samuel,
Daniel, the high priest Heli, St.
Paul, Ananias and Sapphira.
He chose persons who had or had not practiced what the
Scriptures call “fear of the Lord,” an interior
attitude including attention to God, reverence, and humility
inspired by love. Sometimes monastic observances are reinforced
by scriptural allusions or formal citations. Seldom does he
fail to provide biblical ground and justification for whatever
he proposes. The meaning he gives to certain
passages of the Bible might not be that of the modern exegete.
But Benedict does not pose as an exegete; his intention
was to give scriptural dress to his own thought and scriptural
footing to the monastic life he and his followers were leading.
He chose passages that seemed most apt and skillfully wove
them into the context. He may make a simple accommodation of
a text or adopt an allegorical interpretation of the sort that
others before him had used as a theme for the spiritual life
(e.g., Jacob’s ladder and the degrees of humility). But
the basic reason for whatever liberty he takes was to
make understandable to the disciples of his time what God was
saying to them. God Calling: Here and Now For Benedict
the Bible was not simply a book of reference or an object of
study. What he sought and found there was a message of the
present, a call heard here and now. In this
respect the ancient monks and nuns had something of an advantage:
to them the Bible was a book heard rather than read. Monasteries
and convents had each a very limited number of works. Seldom
would one find several copies of the Bible, except for certain
parts like the Psalter and the Gospels. It was mostly through
public reading (through the ear) that God’s message gained
entrance to the soul, with the character of a living and direct
call. When, in addition, followers of Benedict read privately,
they did more than run their eyes over the page; they literally
read it to themselves in muted voice yet loud enough to hear
themselves read the word of God much as one reads a poem for
full effect. Among the instruments of good works Benedict places “to
listen willingly to holy reading” (R 4). Elsewhere he
speaks of the divine voice and the divine discourse (eloquium) . Scripture
consequently assumed the actuality of a message spoken this day
to this disciple. It had the impact of a book just off
the press. Materially it was in the position of a
work of music that exists anew in a manner utterly unique
each time it is performed. Reading technique, however,
is not enough to explain the transforming presence and power
of God’s word. God, who is eternally and inwardly
present to every action of his temporal creature, is singularly
present whenever Scripture is proclaimed. The Holy Spirit,
received in baptism, indwells the soul, prepares it for God’s
seed, and works beforehand to open the ears of the heart to
his word. The “cry” of Scripture (R 7) is perceived
as the voice, the call of God. The call is heard, and the soul
embraces it as a personal message with its living demands addressed
to it individually. The Lord was not satisfied to speak only
in the past; today he still lifts his voice. His word is not
a static reality, lying inert between the covers of a book.
It is what it is called, a word, that is to say, the manifestation
of a living person whom one recognizes by the tone of voice.
Before it even grasps the content of the message, the heart
is touched and drawn to the beloved. “Let
us open our eyes to the deifying light, let us hear with attentive
ears the warning which the divine voice cries daily to us, ‘Today
if you hear his voice, harden not your hearts’ (Ps 94:8).
And again, ‘He who has ears to hear, let him hear what
the Spirit says to the churches’ (Rev 2:7)” (R Prol). “The
Lord, seeking his laborer in the multitude to whom he thus
cries out, says again, ‘Who is the one who will have
life, and desires to see good days?“ (Ibid., see
Ps 34:13) “What
can be sweeter to us, dear brethren, than this voice of the
Lord inviting us? Behold, in his loving kindness the Lord shows
us the way of life” (Ibid.). It is not
only out of the distant past that God’s call is heard;
it is today that he comes to elicit a response from us and
engage in dialogue. The Rule and the Gospel St. Benedict calls the disciple to the school of the Gospel: “Let us walk in the paths of the Lord by the guidance of the Gospel” (R Prol). By these words the Father of monks expresses his intention to establish a life patterned after the Gospel. This is the only true foundation on which a community rests. St. Benedict was well aware that his work represented an embodiment of the Gospel designed for his followers, and Bossuet saw in the Rule “a learned and surprising digest of the entire Gospel teaching.”[1] The Gospel
is the reference point by which to judge the ordinances of
the Rule. It is the key to the spirit, to the particular
genius of the Rule and the rationale behind the way it organizes
monastic life. It is the supreme norm, and the abbot has no
other task than to see that the life of his monks conforms
to it: “The
abbot ought not to teach or ordain or command anything which
is against the Lord’s precepts; on the contrary, his
commands and his teaching should be a leaven of divine justice
kneaded into the minds of his disciples” (R 2). There
is scarcely an observance in Benedict’s monastery that
does not have at least implicit reference to the Gospel and
is based on it. If Scripture and its commentaries are read
at table, it is because the Lord said, “Man shall not
live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the
mouth of God” (Matt 4:4). The entire chapter on humility
is governed by its first statement: “Holy Scripture,
brethren, cries out to us, saying, ‘Everyone who exalts
himself shall be humbled, and he who humbles himself shall
be exalted“ (Luke 14: 11; R 7). Christ is the master
and the teacher, and the community the school where he teaches: “Learn
from me; for I am gentle and lowly in heart,” an explicit
citation of the Lord (Matt 11 :29). This is the reason for
coming to the school of the Lord’s service - to learn
humility and gentleness of heart. For St. Benedict, sacred
Scripture has one author. When he speaks of the words of the
Lord, he has in mind not only the New Testament logia.[2] The message
of the Eternal Word of God is not limited to the very words of Christ, the ipsissima verba, words
certainly authentic in the form they assumed on the lips of the Redeemer
in Aramaic. The words of Christ are found throughout Scripture, and it is
one and the same Lord who speaks there, from end to end. In the
Prologue, St. Benedict quotes freely from Psalm 34, which reads
in part: “Who desires life and covets many days, that
he may enjoy good? Keep your tongue from evil and your lips
from speaking deceit. Depart from evil and do good” (vv.
13-14). He hears in these words Christ calling, and what his
call entails. He exhorts the disciple to answer the call
and conform to the Gospel: “Having our loins girded,
therefore, with faith and the performance of good works, let
us walk in his paths by the guidance of the Gospel. . .” (R Prol;
see Eph 6:14-15). Similarly, his paraphrase of Psalm 14 is
accommodated to the Gospel, Matt 7:24-25. In meditating on the Old
Testament, St. Benedict makes the transfer to the Gospel as
a matter of course. He projects the light of the Gospel on
the entire word of God and gives it a Christian reading. Lectio divina Occupation with the word
of God can take the form of meditative prayer: such was lectio divina. It
was reading done alone, in private. St. Benedict clearly provided
for this use of the disciple’s time, but to those incapable
of applying themselves to it he has some light work assigned
instead. Though private, the reading was not altogether unsupervised: “One
or two of the seniors should be deputed to go about the monastery
at the hours when the brethren are occupied in reading and
see that there be no lazy brother who spends his time in idleness
or gossip and does not apply himself to the reading, so that
he is not only unprofitable to himself but also distracts
others” (R 48). This piece
of inside information on monastic behavior suggests that St.
Benedict allowed his followers considerable latitude as to
the place of reading. It could be the oratory, the cloister,
the dormitory, the garden. Benedict himself preferred
the entrance to the monastery, which overlooked a picturesque
expanse stretching far and wide from the foot of Monte Cassino.
An episode of the Dialogues shows
him at his favorite spot: The Arian Goth named Zalla had
been hounding Christians. One day he collared a peasant farmer
and pummeled him for his money. The poor man, to gain time,
protested that all his money was in Abbot Benedict’s
safekeeping. Whereupon Zalla bound
his hands behind his back with a good strong rope and mounting
his horse, “forced the farmer to walk ahead of him and
lead the way to this Benedict who was keeping his money. .
. When they arrived, they found the man of God sitting alone
in front of the entrance, reading.” One glance from the
abbot, and the prisoner’s bonds fell to his feet. But
neither the miracle nor the trembling Zalla’s ensuing prostrations could divert Benedict
from his reading (D 31). The
monks spent hours every day on the book given to them by direction
of the abbot: “They shall each receive a book from the
library, which they shall read straight through from the beginning.
These books are to be given out at the beginning of Lent” (R
48). It is possible, then, to distinguish three ways for St. Benedict’s followers to come into contact with Scripture: 1) listening to scriptural readings at the night Office, in the refectory, at Compline; 2) studying and memorizing it in the morning after the night Office, as prescribed in the Rule: “The time that remains after the night Office should be spent in study by those brethren who need a better knowledge of the Psalter or the lessons” (R 8); 3) lectio divina the unhurried, affective reading frequently interrupted by prayer, and for which several hours were set aside daily and all day Sunday and feast days except for the hours of the Office and special duties assigned to some. By force of circumstances—lack of copies, for one—lectio divina did not ordinarily come from sacred Scripture itself but from commentaries and the small patristic library to which St. Benedict refers in chapter 73 of the Rule.[3] The reading
was a sacred activity, sacra lectio. Its
first and most important aim was not simply the acquisition
of knowledge but a special kind of wisdom: knowledge with moral
goodness or “fear of the Lord.” All attention of
mind and heart was fastened on the reading; the love and desire
of God were nurtured as the author’s message was gradually
absorbed. In St. Benedict’s Rule monastic reading is
a prayed reading that leads to contemplation. Medieval writers
spoke of “the prayer of meditation.” The monk is
alone with his book, alone before God. He has plenty of time
to pause over a word, a thought, and can resume his reading
as the soul inclines. He is much freer than when reading to
the whole community or listening with the community. Consequently,
his prayer takes a more a spontaneous turn. Spiritually nourished
by hearing the Scriptures read at other times, in lectio divina he
again meets an author who speaks to him of God, much in the
words of sacred Scripture, and through affective prayer he
makes the message more securely his own, the better to live
its content. Practicing God’s Word It is not
enough to hear, to read, even to love God’s word. It
must be put into practice, and imbue the disciple’s life.
St. Benedict is a firm believer in the efficacy of God’s
word. In the chapters on the correction of erring brethren
he instructs the abbot to apply, among others, “the medicines
of the Holy Scriptures” (R 28). He is convinced that
the Scriptures have a latent power to soften the rebellious
will and gently bring it round to observance of their teaching. The word
of God is implanted through faith and is an object of faith,
but without the will’s active cooperation it cannot grow
and thoroughly Christianize every corner of the disciple’s
life, especially the corners that have resisted its influence. Chapter
4 in the Rule is devoted to the instruments of good works:
phrases and sentences culled from the Bible or inspired by
it. According to St. Benedict, this catalogue of spiritual
precepts constitutes the disciple’s tools or equipment
provided by God to accomplish the good that attracted
him or her to the monastery or convent in the first place. Benedict
pursues the comparison: “These, then, are the tools of
the spiritual craft. If we employ them unceasingly day and
night, and return them on the Day of Judgment, our compensation
from the Lord will be that wage he has promised: ‘Eye
has not seen, nor ear heard what God has prepared for those
who love him’ (1 Cor 2:9). Now the workshop in which we shall diligently execute
all these tasks is the enclosure of the monastery and stability
in the community” (R 4). Equipped
with the word of God, the disciples of Benedict strive daily
to put it to work in their lives. They are confident of its
power and of God’s strength to support them. They advance
toward the light already dawning over the horizon.
[1]
Bossuet, Panegyric of St.
Benedict, 1665; ed. J. LeBarcq, IV (Paris, n.d.), 630.
[2]
logia: the utterances or teachings
attributed to Christ and recorded in the Gospels or in other
writings of the apostolic age.
[3]
St. Benedict does not
speak of spiritual conferences that certainly existed. Nor
does he indicate how the community acquired the rudiments of
education necessary for lectio divina. |